Does the date of Doctor Who’s first broadcast give any clues to its longevity, astrologically speaking?
Astrologer David Coleman thinks it does, and has produced a ‘birth’ chart for the programme, and his lengthy accompanying essay explores how ‘the essential meaning of the astrology expressed by Doctor Who’ has manifested itself.
Whatever you make of his conclusions you certainly can’t accuse him of not being thorough, with the carefully drafted chart including information on stars and constellations, co-ordinates for the planets in the sky and other information which, in fairness, is likely to go over the heads of those unfamiliar with astrological terminology.
As far as what all of this means goes, Coleman reckons:
What immediately leaps out is this sense of pushing outwards, of being compelled to flee, to cast away, to reject convention and restriction and to adventure into the bizarre and the extraordinary.
Which is probably as good a one line description of the essence of the programme as any.
What do you think? Was Doctor Who’s success ‘in the air’ as Coleman concludes?