Vampires of Venice has proved a popular episode of Doctor Who, particularly from a critical point of view – we’ve got more links to reviews of the episode from around the web for your enjoyment…
No doubt the additional mainstream media attention came from the recent MediaWatch UK claims that the show was featuring “inappropriate” scenes, not to mention Sir Terry Pratchett’s recent comments in SFX which have been hugely misrepresented.
Certainly The Independent’s Tom Sutcliffe presumed an insight into the creator of Discworld’s enjoyment of Vampires of Venice, but at least it put him in a frame of mind to spot at least one inconsistency in Toby Whithouse’s script:
At one point, the vampire Page 3 babes shrunk from an ultraviolet lamp in classic vampire style. At the next, they were trolling about in the Venetian sunshine baring their lamprey fangs. The contessa’s son could wander around in broad daylight munching on passing wenches, but then was blown into slimy smithereens by a sunbeam angled off the sidekick’s vanity mirror. And again, I don’t give a damn about the inconsistency because I’m probably not going to be watching anyway. But Mr Pratchett was really grumbling by the end.
Den of Geek have provided a lengthy review of Vampires of Venice – convenient as the episode apparently overran the usual time slot, running to a little over 48 minutes. Beyond the realm of inconsistencies, DoG are focussing on the consistencies, the ongoing storyline of cracks, and silence…
The growing theme continues to be the invasion of silence, which the Doctor gets to (not) hear for himself come the last scene of the episode (very effectively, we should add). Throw in too that we had another seemingly irrelevant chat about time being rewritten, and you canâ€™t help but start dreaming up theories. Even standalone episodes in the middle of the series seem to be going somewhere this time round.
Finally, FlickFilosopher MaryAnn Johanson has noticed a key element to the new Doctor Who – who the Doctor is. Not in terms of the actor, or the character, but the focus.
Russell Davies, as a gay man, was in love with the Doctor, and so his tenure on the show was very much from the companionâ€™s/fanâ€™s perspective, because weâ€™re all in love with him, too. Steven Moffat, as a straight man, is imagining himself as the Doctor, and what heâ€™d get up to with all of time and space at his command, not to mention the Doctorâ€™s charisma. The Doctor is a Mary Sue for Moffat. And I think itâ€™s fantastic.
Read more at www.flickfilosopher.com!